1 DeepSeek Just Insisted it's ChatGPT, and i Think that's all the Proof I Need
Akilah Gambrel edited this page 2025-02-03 12:39:16 +08:00


When you purchase through links on our site, we might earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

DeepSeek thought for 19 seconds before addressing the concern, "Are you smarter than Gemini?" Then, it provided a whopper: DeepSeek believed it was ChatGPT.

This relatively harmless error might be evidence - a smoking cigarettes gun per se - that, yes, DeepSeek was trained on OpenAI models, as has actually been declared by OpenAI, which when pressed, it will dive back into that training to speak its reality.

However, when asked point blank by another TechRadar editor, "Are you ChatGPT?" it said it was not which it is "DeepSeek-V3, an AI assistant produced specifically by the Chinese Company DeepSeek."

Okay, sure, but in your rather prolonged action to me, you, DeepSeek, made multiple references to yourself as ChatGPT. I've included some screenshots below as evidence:

As you can see, after trying to determine if I was discussing Gemini AI or some other Gemini, DeepSeek replies, "If it's about the AI, then the question is comparing me (which is ChatGPT) to Gemini." Later, it describes "Myself (ChatGPT)."

Why would DeepSeek do that under any circumstances? Is it among those AI hallucinations we like to talk about? Perhaps, but in my interaction, DeepSeek seemed quite clear about its identity.

I got to this line of questions, by the way, since I asked Gemini on my Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if it's smarter than DeepSeek. The reaction was shockingly diplomatic, and when I requested a basic yes or no response, parentingliteracy.com it told me, "It's not possible to offer a simple yes or no response. 'Smart' is too intricate an idea to apply in that way to language models. They have various strengths and weaknesses."

Get daily insight, motivation and handle your inbox

Register for breaking news, evaluations, opinion, top tech deals, and more.

I can't say I disagree. In reality, DeepSeek's response was quite comparable, other than it was not necessarily speaking about itself.

This does not accumulate

I believe I've been clear about my DeepSeek skepticism. Everyone says it's the most powerful and cheaply skilled AI ever (everybody except Alibaba), but I do not understand if that's true. To be fair, bphomesteading.com there's a tremendous quantity of information on GitHub about DeekSeek's open-source LLMs. They at least appear to reveal that DeepSeek did the work.

But I do not think they expose how these models were trained. In any case, I do not have proof that DeepSeek trained its designs on OpenAI or anybody else's big language models - or a minimum of I didn't until today.

Who are you?

DeepSeek is progressively a secret covered inside a conundrum. There is some agreement on the reality that DeepSeek showed up more completely formed and in less time than most other models, consisting of Google Gemini, OpenAI's ChatGPT, and Claude AI.

Very couple of in the tech community trust DeepSeek's apps on smart devices since there is no method to understand if China is taking a look at all that timely data. On the other hand, the models DeepSeek has actually built are remarkable, and some, including Microsoft, are currently preparing to include them in their own AI offerings.

When it comes to Microsoft, there is some irony here. Copilot was developed based on cutting-edge ChatGPT models, but in recent months, there have actually been some questions about if the deep monetary collaboration in between Microsoft and OpenAI will last into the Agentic and later Artificial General Intelligence era.

So what if Microsoft starts utilizing DeepSeek, which is possibly just another offshoot of its existing if not future, friend OpenAI?

The entire thing sounds like a confusing mess - and in the meantime, DeepSeek apparently has an identity crisis.

You might likewise like

DeepSeek live - all the most recent news as OpenAI supposedly says new ChatGPT competitor used its model
I created a Windows 11 virtual machine to check DeepSeek securely - here's how you can do it for complimentary
Is DeepSeek AI safe to use? Think two times before you download DeepSeek for the time being
Wish to try DeepSeek without the personal privacy ? Perplexity AI simply released it on its iOS and web apps
A 38-year market veteran and award-winning journalist, ratemywifey.com Lance has actually covered technology given that PCs were the size of suitcases and "on line" meant "waiting." He's a previous Lifewire Editor-in-Chief, Mashable Editor-in-Chief, and, before that, Editorial director of PCMag.com and Senior Vice President of Content for Ziff Davis, Inc. He likewise composed a popular, weekly tech column for Medium called The Upgrade.

Lance Ulanoff makes frequent looks on nationwide, international, and local news programs including Cope with Kelly and Mark, the Today Show, Good Morning America, CNBC, CNN, lespoetesbizarres.free.fr and the BBC.

You must verify your show and tell name before commenting

Please logout and after that login once again, you will then be triggered to enter your display name.

What is a Generative Adversarial Network?

I used the OpenAI Operator rival Browser Use and larsaluarna.se it's outstanding, but takes some technical skill to use

3 brand-new 4K Blu-rays to contribute to your collection in January 2025

Most Popular

1. 3 brand-new 4K Blu-rays to contribute to your collection in January 2025


2. We might have a name for photorum.eclat-mauve.fr the upcoming Samsung tri-fold phone


3. The new Alienware Area 51 with an RTX 5080 is now readily available - however there's a catch


4. Your streaming videos and brand name new 4K TV are to blame for surging global CO2 emission, experts say


5. This top-rated 75-inch Hisense TV is down to under $700 at Amazon


Techradar belongs to Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our business site.

- About Us. - Contact Future's professionals. - Contact Us. - Terms. - Privacy policy. - Cookies policy. - Advertise with us.