lankantrades

For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a good friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few simple triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's an interesting read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, online-learning-initiative.org however it's likewise a bit recurring, and very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI -book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, since rotating from assembling AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, drapia.org but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to broaden his variety, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI -generated items to human clients.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI -generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes must be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful however let's develop it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of delight," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear pledge of development."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them certify their content, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and wakewiki.de even a comic.

They claim that the AI the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm unsure for how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.